| • |
Colorado Water Conservation Board Adopts SDS Fish and Wildlife Mitigtion Plan: A Fish and Wildlife Mitigation Plan (FWMP), developed in partnership with the Colorado Division of Wildlife for the Southern Delivery System (SDS), was adopted on May 19, 2010 by the Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB). With acceptance of the plan by the Colorado Wildlife Commission and the adoption by CWCB, the FWMP will serve as the state of Colorado’s official position on the wildlife mitigation activities required for the project. The plan was developed pursuant to state law and the Record of Decision (ROD).
View eNews PDF Document |
| |
|
| • |
City Council approves initial water rate phase-in to fund SDS and current system: On May 11, the Colorado Springs City Council approved a phased-in water rate case that will fund initial construction of the Southern Delivery System (SDS) and costs for operating and maintaining the existing water system. Council voted 8-1 in favor of 12% water rate increases for 2011 and 2012. The change will add about $4.42 to the typical monthly residential bill starting in January 2011 and another $4.96 to the monthly bill beginning January 2012 – increasing the overall utilities bill by less than 3 percent each year. While not part of this rate case, similar adjustments will be needed through 2016.
View eNews PDF Document |
| |
|
| • |
Quarterly Progress Update, April 2010: Several significant advancements for the Southern Delivery System (SDS) project were achieved in the first quarter of 2010. Construction for SDS – one of the largest and most important water projects underway in Colorado – is expected to begin later this year. April 2010 Quarterly Progress Update PDF Document. |
| |
|
| • |
Regional contractors to build Pueblo
Dam connection for SDS: Colorado Springs Utilities
has announced a regional team of contractors to build the Pueblo
Dam connection for the Southern Delivery System (SDS). ASI Constructors
Inc. – a nationally recognized firm headquartered in Pueblo
County – was selected as the prime contractor. ASI Constructors
Inc. specializes in the construction and rehabilitation of dams,
spillways, and major water resource projects and plans to use
several regional sub-contractors for the SDS dam connection
project. Construction on the Pueblo Dam connection is scheduled
to begin this summer and will take approximately one year to
complete.
View
eNews PDF Document |
| |
|
| • |
El Paso County Planning Commission
Approves SDS Location Approval Applications: On Tuesday,
March 16, 2010, Colorado Springs Utilities received unanimous
approval from the El Paso County Planning Commission on three
additional location approval applications for the Southern Delivery
System project. Planning Commission members approved applications
for the Bradley Pump Station, Upper Williams Creek Reservoir,
and the Exchange Flow Facilities including Williams Creek Reservoir.
The Planning Commission approved applications for the raw- and
treated-water pipelines on March 2. View
Presentation PDF Document | View
eNews PDF Document |
| |
|
| • |
Colorado Wildlife Commission approves
SDS Fish and Wildlife Mitigation Plan: On Thursday,
March 11, 2010, Colorado Springs Utilities received unanimous
approval from the Colorado Wildlife Commission on the Fish and
Wildlife Mitigation Plan (FWMP) for the Southern Delivery System
(SDS). The plan was developed in collaboration with the Colorado
Division of Wildlife (CDOW) over the last year and outlines
specific mitigation to address projected impacts to fish and
wildlife as a result of SDS operations. The approval was made
conditional on finalizing a draft Memorandum of Agreement to
implement the plan with CDOW. Once the Agreement is finalized,
CDOW will submit the plan on behalf of the SDS Project Participants
to the Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB) for adoption.
The FWMP was developed pursuant to provisions of state law and
related requirements of the project’s Record of Decision
issued by the Bureau of Reclamation. View
Presentation PDF Document | View
Fish and Wildlife Mitigation Plan | View
eNews PDF Document
|
| |
|
| • |
El Paso County Planning Commission
approves pipeline permits for SDS: On March 2, 2010,
the El Paso County Planning Commission voted unanimously in
favor of location approval applications for the Southern Delivery
System raw-water and finished-water pipelines. Last fall, a
series of applications were submitted to El Paso County for
Location Approval Permits for the project. View
Presentation PDF Document | View
eNews PDF Document |
| |
|
| • |
SDS Reviews Draft Fish and Wildlife
Mitigation Plan During Colorado Wildlife Commission Workshop:
In compliance with the requirements of the Environmental Impact
Statement Record of Decision (ROD) and consistent with our commitment
to build an environmentally responsible project, Colorado Springs
Utilities has been working with the Colorado Division of Wildlife
(DOW) for nearly a year to develop a Draft Fish and Wildlife
Mitigation Plan (FWMP) for the Southern Delivery System (SDS).
The plan, which was presented to the Colorado Wildlife Commission
Feb. 11, 2010, outlines projected impacts to fish and wildlife
as a result of SDS operations and provides a blueprint to address
those impacts. View
eNews PDF Document |
| |
|
| • |
SDS Obtains Approval from Fountain
Creek Watershed, Flood Control and Greenway District:
The Southern Delivery System (SDS) achieved another approval
on Jan. 22, 2010 with a vote in favor of its application submitted
to the Fountain Creek Watershed, Flood Control and Greenway
District. The District Board voted unanimously in support of
the SDS project components that fall within the Fountain Creek
Corridor and will recommend approval to the El Paso County Planning
Commission for project facilities that are outside the Corridor
but within the watershed in El Paso County. View
Presentation PDF Document | View
eNews PDF Document |
| |
|
| • |
In January 2010, Colorado Springs
Utilities provided Pueblo County a report of our annual
expenditures for wastewater system improvements to fulfill a
commitment made in one of the permit conditions. We committed
to spending $75 million to improve wastewater and reuse systems
between Jan. 1, 2009 and Dec. 31, 2024. In 2009 alone, Colorado
Springs Utilities spent close to $9 million of the $75 million
on these programs, including repairs or rehabilitation of 108,000
feet of sewer pipe and rehabilitation of 131 manholes. In addition
to this progress on commitments for the 1041 permit, Colorado
Springs Utilities invested another $12.8 million in 2009 on
improvements to large diameter wastewater pipes and sanitary
sewer creek crossing projects in accordance with a state compliance
order which is nearly complete. Read
full report. |
| |
|
| • |
Quarterly Progress Update, December
2009. Looking back on 2009, we achieved numerous milestones
for the Southern Delivery System. The project team continues
work to clear the final hurdles needed before construction can
begin in 2010. Dec. 2009 Quarterly
Progress Update PDF Document. |
| |
|
| • |
Quarterly Progress Update, July
2009. After more than a decade of planning, public
process and permitting, we have been given the green light to
implement the Southern Delivery System. Quarterly
Progress Update PDF Document. |
| |
|
| • |
Utilities Board Approves Moving
Forward With SDS: The Colorado Springs Utilities Board
today approved moving forward with the Preferred Alternative
– a pipeline beginning at Pueblo Dam – for the Southern
Delivery System (SDS).
View Presentation PDF Document |
View
eNews PDF Document |
| |
|
| • |
Smoother sailing for once-contentious
project. When it was up for federal approval, Colorado
Springs Utilities’ proposed water pipeline from Pueblo
Reservoir drew more than 400 comments for and against the project.
Times. have changed. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is considering
the last major permit for the Southern Delivery System, under
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, because pipeline construction
will impact 14.2 acres of streams and wetlands. The public comment
period ended Friday and 13 people and organizations –
12 against, one in favor – submitted comments, a possible
sign that people see the once-controversial project as a foregone
conclusion, since the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and Pueblo
County have both approved it. The
Gazette, June 23, 2009. PDF Document. |
| |
|
| • |
Quarterly Progress Update, April
2009. In the past quarter, we have reached several
truly historic milestones for the Southern Delivery System.
Quarterly
Progress Update PDF Document. |
| |
|
| • |
Upper Williams Creek Reservoir:
One of the benefits of the Southern Delivery System
will be a new water storage reservoir offering recreational
opportunities in close proximity to Colorado Springs. The
SDS Preferred Alternative terminal water reservoir would be
located on Upper Williams Creek just 14 miles southeast of
downtown Colorado Springs. . . . .
. (more) |
| |
|
| • |
Pueblo County issues 1041 permit
for SDS: On April 21, 2009, the Pueblo Board of County
Commissioners unanimously approved a resolution to issue a 1041
land-use permit for the Southern Delivery System Preferred Alternative.
Bruce McCormick, Colorado Springs Utilities Chief Water Services
Officer, expressed Colorado Springs’ gratitude to Pueblo
County for a fair and open process. “This agreement paves
the way for several communities in southern Colorado to come
together,” he said. . . . . (more) |
| |
|
| • |
Colorado Springs City Council Votes
to Recognize Pueblo County Permit Conditions: On April
14, 2009, the Colorado Springs City Council voted 8-1 in favor
of a resolution to formally recognize the commitments in the
terms and conditions of the Pueblo County 1041 land-use permit.
The resolution will preserve our ability to construct the Southern
Delivery System (SDS) Preferred Alternative - a pipeline from
Pueblo Reservoir. . . . (more) |
| |
|
| • |
On March 23, 2009, the Bureau of
Reclamation announced its release of the Record of Decision
(ROD) for the Southern Delivery System (SDS) –
completing its review of the $1.1 billion water project under
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). “This is
a critical milestone toward making the Southern Delivery System,
and the water it will provide for our future, a reality,”
said Colorado Springs Mayor Lionel Rivera. “Reclamation’s
review of SDS was lengthy, thorough and complete and we will
construct a better project as a result.” “With the
approval of our land use permit in Fremont County and approval
by the Pueblo County Commissioners of the conditions for the
Pueblo 1041 Permit, the issuance of the ROD brings us even closer
to making SDS a reality,” said John Fredell, SDS Project
Director . . . . (more) |
| |
|
| • |
Pueblo County Approves SDS 1041
Permit: The Pueblo County Board of County Commissioners
voted 3-0 on March 18, 2009, to approve a 1041 land-use permit
with its staff recommended terms and conditions for the Southern
Delivery System (SDS) project in Pueblo County. “This
has been an extensive and thorough public process,” said
John Fredell, SDS Project Director. “The unanimous vote
from the County Commissioners is a historic milestone for the
project and a testament to the significant work by many individuals
to reach an agreement that has the potential to benefit both
communities.” The permit for the SDS Preferred Alternative
– a pipeline from Pueblo Reservoir – was approved
with staff recommended terms and conditions. Major conditions
include Colorado Springs’ mitigation of impacts to Fountain
Creek from SDS by funding $50 million to the new Fountain Creek
Watershed District or similar entity for erosion, sedimentation,
flood control or water quality improvement projects. In addition,
Colorado Springs would invest $75 million in planned improvements
to its wastewater collection system or reuse systems by 2024.
The proposed terms and conditions are now subject to review
and acceptance by the Colorado Springs City Council through
a public process. Pending Colorado Springs’ approval,
Pueblo County officials indicated they are prepared to take
final action as early as April 2. Fredell added that “I
want to caution that this doesn’t mean construction is
imminent. This means we are closer to having two viable options
for our management and Council to analyze and decide which is
in the best interest of our customers.” |